[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128095349.6a3537a2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:53:49 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:46:11 +0530
Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com> wrote:
> The ring_buffer_producer uses 'struct timeval' to measure
> its start and end times. 'struct timeval' on 32-bit systems
> will have its tv_sec value overflow in year 2038 and beyond.
> This patch replaces struct timeval with 'ktime_t' which uses
> 64-bit representation for nanoseconds.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Fix typo in commit message.
> - Avoid typecast to 'long long' by defining RUN_TIME as '10ULL'
> instead of '10'.
Although I have not tested this, this patch looks fine to me. Is this
going to go through some cleanup tree or should I just pull it?
-- Steve
> Changes in v3:
> - Use a more efficient way to compute condition for exiting loop.
> - Fix variable naming - all caps is only for macros.
> Changes in v2:
> - Use ktime_t instead of timespec64 for efficiency reasons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists