[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128153912.GL28663@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:39:13 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT
* Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net> [150128 06:37]:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 28 January 2015 01:50:33 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > On omaps, the bootrom passes the bootreason in r1 to the
> > > bootloader that can do whatever it wants with it. We could
> > > maybe pass it in the kernel cmdline to the watchdog driver
> > > for user space?
> > >
> >
> > Not truth for N900. Bootreason depends on PRM_RSTST omap
> > register, state of vbat charger pins, time how long was power key
> > pressed, R&D data stored in CAL partition and other undocumented
> > registers for omap HS devices. I already tried to implement at
> > least some subset of it in userspace (or kernel), but it is
> > impossible because NOLO bootloader clear status of PRM_RSTST
> > register.
> >
> > There is also copy of PRM_RSTST register stored at address
> > 0x4020FFB8 (tracing data) but that address is rewritten (probably
> > by kernel), so we really cannot implement reading bootreason in
> > kernel.
> >
> > But in early stage in uboot it is possible to read 0x4020FFB8
> > address and get some part of bootreason. But still PRM_RSTST is
> > not enough!
> >
> > I would be happy if DT kernel can export /proc/atags file with
> > ATAGs passed by bootloader. It would be enough for me. In
> > userspace I can parse content and do what is needed.
>
> What about defining a DT boot reason property instead?
> Maybe it already exists? If not, it's something that could certainly be
> generically used on other platforms too.
>
> Converting the special ATAG into its standard DT equivalent would then
> be trivial and much cleaner overall.
Sounds good to me as then we don't have to add any legacy custom
Nokia specific atag. And it won't prevent us from adding a generic
ATAG_BOOTREASON if really needed.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists