lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:52:56 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> CC: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Barry.Song@....com, baruch@...s.co.il, linux@...pel-privat.de, rob.herring@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] clocksource: Driver for Conexant Digicolor SoC timer On 01/29/2015 02:37 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:08 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> >> >> Add clocksource driver to the Conexant CX92755 SoC, part of the Digicolor SoCs >> series. Hardware provides 8 timers, A to H. Timer A is dedicated to a future >> watchdog driver so we don't use it here. Use timer B for sched_clock, and timer >> C for clock_event. >> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> >> --- >> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 3 + >> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> index a89120b..72a3827 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ config CLKBLD_I8253 >> config CLKSRC_MMIO >> bool >> >> +config DIGICOLOR_TIMER >> + bool >> + > > And the select for this symbol (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/360) > will be provided in a separate patch? Because this patch, by itself, > won't allow DIGICOLOR_TIMER to be set, will it? You are right, that should be done in a separate patch. I believe Baruch should have done that. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists