[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150129092256.1c84193c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:22:56 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] scsi: Some seq_file cleanups/optimizations
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:16:16 +0100
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> Steven, you've been doing some cleanup in this area, among other things
> trying to make all the seq_* functions return void. Could you fill me in
> on the status of that?
Yes, the entire seq_*() operations are ambiguous in how they handle
filling the buffers. Don't worry about side effects of using one seq
operation over another (I highly doubt anyone will notice).
I had to stop doing the cleanups to work on other things, but I have
patches to make all seq operations perform the same (and also use the
new seq_buf infrastructure).
And, please ignore any return value from the seq operations. If you
want to know if the buffer is full use seq_has_overflowed() to find out.
I'll try to continue this clean up as a side project.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists