linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54CA502D.9030307@nexus-software.ie>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:22:21 +0000
From:	Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To:	"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

On 29/01/15 13:47, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
> Bryan,
>
> Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across both Galileo Gen v1 & v2.
>
> Cheers,
> BL

Andy/BL - thanks for taking the time to test.

I may end up dropping the imr_del_range() tests based on index as a 
result of changing the external interface as suggested by Ingo.

If you guys have a clear preference to keep those tests shout now and 
I'll re-merge the imr_selftest code into the main chunk of IMR code.

--
BOD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/