[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABuKBe+gCH9+qOAyu0NGknt83eLjMhe7+MeuEU0k9H=qoHV7oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:44:19 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
YH Chen (陳昱豪) <yh.chen@...iatek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Yingjoe Chen (陳英洲)
<Yingjoe.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MediaTek PMIC support
2015-01-29 15:27 GMT+01:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:39:42PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> Hi Sascha,
>>
>> 2015-01-26 12:47 GMT+01:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>:
>> > Olof, Arnd,
>> >
>> > OK to put the driver into drivers/soc/mediatek? Can you take these
>> > patches?
>>
>> How does this patches fit together with the one James clock framework patches?
>> Both use the same compatible "mediatek,mt8135-infracfg" and
>> "mediatek,mt8135-pericfg".
>>
>> I had a look on other implementations and they attach the reset
>> controller to the clk driver, if they share the same hw block.
>> Might we run into problems if we implement the clocks in the mfd, as
>> we need the clocks early in boot (e.g. for the timer)?
>
> From my experience the clocks are needed by the timer before any driver
> initializes.
>
>>
>> In mt6589 pericfg apart from the clocks and reset controller provides
>> registers for AXI bus control and USB wakeup and USB clock selection.
>> The infracfg block provides top AXI bus fabric control signals and
>> remap registers for the modem.
>> Mike, Stephen, what do you think. Can we implement the clk in a mfd
>> driver? Or do you prefer to implement the whole block in the clk
>> driver?
>
> Currently the clk support uses regular CLK_OF_DECLARE which handles the
> clock part of pericfg/infracfg and then later a regular driver for
> pericfg/infracfg comes and handles the rest of the functionality. Since
> both use separate registers in the device register space it should work
> fine.
It should work until some driver start to use request and map, as you
provide the whole register space.
If you want to implement drivers for pericfg/infracfg like this, why
don't you implement the reset controller in drivers/reset?
Anyway I'm not really happy with the solution of having several device
drivers for the same dts compatible string.
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
motzblog.wordpress.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists