lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMhycUD4ZfQccjD=zzRB901u0YT1NqCuA7chNTnvgt7Fsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:06:12 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup/soc for 3.20 #4

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/01/2015 at 14:08:25 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>> >>
>> >> This is a batch of cleanup/soc modifications that you may also stack on top of
>> >> your "soc" branch as the previous one.
>> >> It collects some more cleanup material and simplifies the AT91 boot code. Only
>> >> some little details remain before having a classical DT boot (without additional
>> >> mapping of registers for instance). This part will be addressed in 3.21.
>> >>
>> >> The switch to multi-platform is not included as it needs some patches in ASoC,
>> >> ata and arm-soc/next/drivers to be able to compile. I may send patches or a
>> >> pull-request that can be send to Linus late during the merge-window. Tell me
>> >> how you feel it can be done (or delayed to 3.21).
>> >>
>> >> The conflict related to the rename of board-dt-sama5.c => sama5.c is solved in
>> >> this branch:
>> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git/log/?h=arm-soc-for-next%2bat91-3.20-cleanup
>> >>
>
> The conflict is fixed there ;)

This conflict will bubble all the way up to Linus. I wonder if it's
better to just include the fix as a base of this branch. Not merged on
top, but as a base. That'll be easiest of all.

Nicolas, can you respin with that as base? Since that fixes branch
from you is based on -rc1, it should work out quite well.



-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ