[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMhycUD4ZfQccjD=zzRB901u0YT1NqCuA7chNTnvgt7Fsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:06:12 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup/soc for 3.20 #4
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/01/2015 at 14:08:25 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>> >>
>> >> This is a batch of cleanup/soc modifications that you may also stack on top of
>> >> your "soc" branch as the previous one.
>> >> It collects some more cleanup material and simplifies the AT91 boot code. Only
>> >> some little details remain before having a classical DT boot (without additional
>> >> mapping of registers for instance). This part will be addressed in 3.21.
>> >>
>> >> The switch to multi-platform is not included as it needs some patches in ASoC,
>> >> ata and arm-soc/next/drivers to be able to compile. I may send patches or a
>> >> pull-request that can be send to Linus late during the merge-window. Tell me
>> >> how you feel it can be done (or delayed to 3.21).
>> >>
>> >> The conflict related to the rename of board-dt-sama5.c => sama5.c is solved in
>> >> this branch:
>> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git/log/?h=arm-soc-for-next%2bat91-3.20-cleanup
>> >>
>
> The conflict is fixed there ;)
This conflict will bubble all the way up to Linus. I wonder if it's
better to just include the fix as a base of this branch. Not merged on
top, but as a base. That'll be easiest of all.
Nicolas, can you respin with that as base? Since that fixes branch
from you is based on -rc1, it should work out quite well.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists