[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501282104490.9275@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: Scot Doyle <lkml14@...tdoyle.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hello Vivek,
> >
> > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments
> > >> above. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Thank you for following it up and improving kexec man page.
> >
> > You're welcome. So, by now, I've made quite a lot of changes
> > (including adding a number of cases under ERRORS). I think the revised
> > kexec_load/kexec_file_load page is pretty much ready to go, but would
> > you be willing to give the text below a check over first?
> >
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I had a quick look and it looks good to me.
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same
true for kexec_load? Would it make sense to note this in the man pages
along with the need for CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, etc? Or as an error message?
Thanks,
Scot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists