lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1422483682-15393-70-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:20:12 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 069/139] mnt: Implicitly add MNT_NODEV on remount when it was implicitly added by mount

3.13.11-ckt15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

commit 3e1866410f11356a9fd869beb3e95983dc79c067 upstream.

Now that remount is properly enforcing the rule that you can't remove
nodev at least sandstorm.io is breaking when performing a remount.

It turns out that there is an easy intuitive solution implicitly
add nodev on remount when nodev was implicitly added on mount.

Tested-by: Cedric Bosdonnat <cbosdonnat@...e.com>
Tested-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/namespace.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index fe2b527..32f2b2d 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1945,7 +1945,13 @@ static int do_remount(struct path *path, int flags, int mnt_flags,
 	}
 	if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_NODEV) &&
 	    !(mnt_flags & MNT_NODEV)) {
-		return -EPERM;
+		/* Was the nodev implicitly added in mount? */
+		if ((mnt->mnt_ns->user_ns != &init_user_ns) &&
+		    !(sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_USERNS_DEV_MOUNT)) {
+			mnt_flags |= MNT_NODEV;
+		} else {
+			return -EPERM;
+		}
 	}
 	if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_NOSUID) &&
 	    !(mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID)) {
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ