[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201501281438.46942@pali>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:38:46 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 03:07:43 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> In other words, what prevents someone from creating, say, a
> custom minimal Barebox version that sits on top of the
> existing N900 bootloader? Wouldn't that provide a much
> better user experience?
>
Strong cryptography used for signing first stage bootloader,
undocumented interface and other stuff which initialize HW and
small memory (about 100kB) for second stage non-signed
bootloader. Next kernel image is limited to size 2MB. And
currently uboot can be compiled to act as "kernel" image, so
second stage bootloader can boot it.
I spend some time to replace second (non signed) bootloader with
something other, but really it is not possible.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists