[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1422458557.5293.51.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:22:37 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 02/26] iommu: Add new member capability to struct
irq_remap_ops
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 23:14 +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> This patch adds a new member capability to struct irq_remap_ops,
> this new function ops can be used to check whether some
> features are supported, such as VT-d Posted-Interrupts.
> + /* Check some capability is supported */
> + bool (*capability)(enum irq_remap_cap);
> +
Does this need to be a function call? Or could we just have a set of
flags in the irq_remap_ops instead, with less overhead to check them?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5745 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists