linux-kernel - [PATCH 28/42] perf tools: Protect dso cache tree using dso->lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1422518843-25818-29-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:07:09 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 28/42] perf tools: Protect dso cache tree using dso->lock

The dso cache is accessed during dwarf callchain unwind and it might
be processed concurrently when multi-thread report is enabled.
Protect it under dso->lock.

Note that it doesn't protect dso_cache__find().  I think it's safe to
access to the cache tree without the lock since we don't delete nodes.
It it missed an existing node due to rotation, it'll find it during
dso_cache__insert() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/dso.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
index 3da75816b8f8..11ece224ef50 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
@@ -443,10 +443,12 @@ bool dso__data_status_seen(struct dso *dso, enum dso_data_status_seen by)
 }
 
 static void
-dso_cache__free(struct rb_root *root)
+dso_cache__free(struct dso *dso)
 {
+	struct rb_root *root = &dso->data.cache;
 	struct rb_node *next = rb_first(root);
 
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
 	while (next) {
 		struct dso_cache *cache;
 
@@ -455,10 +457,12 @@ dso_cache__free(struct rb_root *root)
 		rb_erase(&cache->rb_node, root);
 		free(cache);
 	}
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
 }
 
-static struct dso_cache *dso_cache__find(const struct rb_root *root, u64 offset)
+static struct dso_cache *dso_cache__find(struct dso *dso, u64 offset)
 {
+	const struct rb_root *root = &dso->data.cache;
 	struct rb_node * const *p = &root->rb_node;
 	const struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
 	struct dso_cache *cache;
@@ -477,17 +481,20 @@ static struct dso_cache *dso_cache__find(const struct rb_root *root, u64 offset)
 		else
 			return cache;
 	}
+
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void
-dso_cache__insert(struct rb_root *root, struct dso_cache *new)
+static struct dso_cache *
+dso_cache__insert(struct dso *dso, struct dso_cache *new)
 {
+	struct rb_root *root = &dso->data.cache;
 	struct rb_node **p = &root->rb_node;
 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
 	struct dso_cache *cache;
 	u64 offset = new->offset;
 
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
 	while (*p != NULL) {
 		u64 end;
 
@@ -499,10 +506,17 @@ dso_cache__insert(struct rb_root *root, struct dso_cache *new)
 			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
 		else if (offset >= end)
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+		else
+			goto out;
 	}
 
 	rb_link_node(&new->rb_node, parent, p);
 	rb_insert_color(&new->rb_node, root);
+
+	cache = NULL;
+out:
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
+	return cache;
 }
 
 static ssize_t
@@ -520,6 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t
 dso_cache__read(struct dso *dso, u64 offset, u8 *data, ssize_t size)
 {
 	struct dso_cache *cache;
+	struct dso_cache *old;
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	do {
@@ -543,7 +558,12 @@ dso_cache__read(struct dso *dso, u64 offset, u8 *data, ssize_t size)
 
 		cache->offset = cache_offset;
 		cache->size   = ret;
-		dso_cache__insert(&dso->data.cache, cache);
+		old = dso_cache__insert(dso, cache);
+		if (old) {
+			/* we lose the race */
+			free(cache);
+			cache = old;
+		}
 
 		ret = dso_cache__memcpy(cache, offset, data, size);
 
@@ -560,7 +580,7 @@ static ssize_t dso_cache_read(struct dso *dso, u64 offset,
 {
 	struct dso_cache *cache;
 
-	cache = dso_cache__find(&dso->data.cache, offset);
+	cache = dso_cache__find(dso, offset);
 	if (cache)
 		return dso_cache__memcpy(cache, offset, data, size);
 	else
@@ -915,7 +935,7 @@ void dso__delete(struct dso *dso)
 	}
 
 	dso__data_close(dso);
-	dso_cache__free(&dso->data.cache);
+	dso_cache__free(dso);
 	dso__free_a2l(dso);
 	zfree(&dso->symsrc_filename);
 	pthread_mutex_destroy(&dso->lock);
-- 
2.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/