[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1422526158.14137.2@smtp.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:17:18 +0008
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: serialize Offer and Rescind
offer
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@...hat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 20:09 PM
>> To: Dexuan Cui
>> Cc: KY Srinivasan; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; Haiyang Zhang;
>> linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jason Wang; Radim Krčmář; Dan Carpenter
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: serialize Offer and
>> Rescind
>> offer
>>
>> Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> writes:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@...hat.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 23:45 PM
>> >> To: KY Srinivasan; devel@...uxdriverproject.org
>> >> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui;
>> Jason Wang;
>> >> Radim Krčmář; Dan Carpenter
>> >> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: serialize Offer and
>> Rescind
>> offer
>> ...
>> >
>> > Hi Vitaly and all,
>> > I have 2 questions:
>> > In vmbus_process_offer(), in the cases of "goto err_free_chan",
>> > should we consider the possibility a rescind message could be
>> pending for
>> > the new channel?
>> > In the cases, because we don't run
>> > "INIT_WORK(&newchannel->work, vmbus_process_rescind_offer); ",
>> > vmbus_onoffer_rescind() will do nothing and as a result,
>> > vmbus_process_rescind_offer() won't be invoked.
>>
>> Yes, but processing the rescind offer results in freeing the channel
>> (and this processing supposes the channel wasn't freed before) so
>> there is no difference... or is it?
>>
>> >
>> > Question 2: in vmbus_process_offer(), in the case
>> > vmbus_device_register() fails, we'll run
>> > "list_del(&newchannel->listentry);" -- just after this line,
>> > what will happen at this time if relid2channel() returns NULL
>> > in vmbus_onoffer_rescind()?
>> >
>> > I think we'll lose the rescind message.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but same logic applies - we already freed the channes so no
>> rescind
>> proccessing required.
> free_channel() and vmbus_process_rescind_offer() are different,
> because
> the latter does more work, e.g., sending the host a message
> CHANNELMSG_RELID_RELEASED.
>
> In the cases of "goto err_free_chan" + "a pending rescind message",
> the host may expect the message CHANNELMSG_RELID_RELEASED and
> could reoffer the channel once the message is received.
>
> It would be better if the VM doesn't lose the rescind message here.
> :-)
It's interesting that rescind needs a ack from guest. But looks like
the offer does not need it? Is there a spec for this for us for
reference?
Thanks
>
>
>> If we still need to do something we need to
>> add support for already freed channel to the rescind offer
>> processing path.
>>
>
> Thanks,
> -- Dexuan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists