lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <006801d03c4b$d7761c00$86625400$@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:15:02 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: should fail mount when trying to recover data on
 read-only dev

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-fsdevel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fsdevel-owner@...r.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Jaegeuk Kim
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:32 AM
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: should fail mount when trying to recover data on read-only dev
> 
> If device is read-only, we should not proceed data recovery.
> But, if the previous checkpoint was done by normal clean shutdown, it's safe to
> proceed the recovery, since there will be no data to be recovered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ