[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150130182805.GA20075@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:28:05 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, riel@...hat.com, sbsiddha@...il.com,
luto@...capital.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it
safer
On 01/30, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> +void *tsk_get_xsave_field(struct task_struct *tsk, int xsave_field)
> +{
> + union thread_xstate *xstate;
> +
> + unlazy_fpu(tsk);
ack, but to remind this depends on 2/3 I sent.
> + xstate = tsk->thread.fpu.state;
> + /*
> + * This might be unallocated if the FPU
> + * was never in use.
> + */
> + if (!xstate)
> + return NULL;
This is cosmetic, unlazy_fpu() is safe if !xstate, __thread_has_fpu()
is not possible in this case.
But perhaps
if (!used_math())
return NULL;
will look better.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists