linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: Conditionally support non-root users, groups and capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:56:14 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: Conditionally support non-root users, groups
 and capabilities

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
> *Today*, Linux is a challenging choice for a tiny embedded system.
> We're trying to fix that.

Can you please more specific about the embedded systems exactly you're
talking about?

I find this patch rather controversial as it removes a lot of security.
Embedded systems *are* a target for all kind of attacks.
Misguided embedded engineers will abuse this feature and produce even more
weak targets.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/