[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465455.9L1ju05BhM@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:06:37 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
GTA04 owners <gta04-owner@...delico.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@...lamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ: don't suspend nested_thread irqs over system suspend.
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 09:25:45 AM NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires.
> So when the parent is suspended, there is no need to suspend
> the child irq.
>
> Suspending nested irqs can cause a problem is they are suspended or
> resumed in the wrong order.
> If an interrupt fires while the parent is active but the child is
> suspended, then the interrupt will not be acknowledged properly
> and so an interrupt storm can result.
> This is particularly likely if the parent is resumed before
> the child, and the interrupt was raised during suspend.
>
> Ensuring correct ordering would be possible, but it is simpler
> to just never suspend nested interrupts. This patch does that.
Clever. :-)
This is fine by me. Thomas, what do you think?
> This patch allows the IRQF_EARLY_RESUME to be removed from
> twl4030_sih_setup(). That flag attempts to fix the same problem
> is a very different way, but causes
>
> [ 56.095825] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3 at ../kernel/irq/manage.c:661 irq_nested_primary_handler+0x18/0x28()
> [ 56.095825] Primary handler called for nested irq 348
>
> warnings on resume.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> index 3ca532592704..40cbcfb7fc43 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
> unsigned long flags;
> bool sync;
>
> + if (irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
> + continue;
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> sync = suspend_device_irq(desc, irq);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> @@ -158,6 +160,8 @@ static void resume_irqs(bool want_early)
>
> if (!is_early && want_early)
> continue;
> + if (irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
> + continue;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> resume_irq(desc, irq);
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists