[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <261ebee6aee55a4724746d0d7024697013c40a08.1422709102.git.luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 05:01:34 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, traps: Fix ist_enter from userspace
context_tracking_user_exit() has no effect if in_interrupt() returns true,
so ist_enter() didn't work. Fix it by calling exception_enter(), and thus
context_tracking_user_exit(), before incrementing the preempt count.
This also adds an assertion that will catch the problem reliably if
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y to help prevent the bug from being reintroduced.
Fixes: 959274753857 x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
---
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 7176f84f95a4..c74f2f5652da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -110,15 +110,11 @@ static inline void preempt_conditional_cli(struct pt_regs *regs)
enum ctx_state ist_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- /*
- * We are atomic because we're on the IST stack (or we're on x86_32,
- * in which case we still shouldn't schedule.
- */
- preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
+ enum ctx_state prev_state;
if (user_mode_vm(regs)) {
/* Other than that, we're just an exception. */
- return exception_enter();
+ prev_state = exception_enter();
} else {
/*
* We might have interrupted pretty much anything. In
@@ -127,12 +123,27 @@ enum ctx_state ist_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
* but we need to notify RCU.
*/
rcu_nmi_enter();
- return IN_KERNEL; /* the value is irrelevant. */
+ prev_state = IN_KERNEL; /* the value is irrelevant. */
}
+
+ /*
+ * We are atomic because we're on the IST stack (or we're on x86_32,
+ * in which case we still shouldn't schedule).
+ *
+ * This must be after exception_enter(), because exception_enter()
+ * won't do anything if in_interrupt() returns true.
+ */
+ preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
+
+ /* This code is a bit fragile. Test it. */
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(), "ist_enter didn't work");
+
+ return prev_state;
}
void ist_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, enum ctx_state prev_state)
{
+ /* Must be before exception_exit. */
preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
if (user_mode_vm(regs))
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists