[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54CC3334.9010705@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:43:16 +0800
From: "Yun Wu (Abel)" <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] irqchip: gicv3-its: add support for power down
On 2015/1/31 3:23, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 30/01/15 07:46, Yun Wu wrote:
>> Configurations of an ITS cannot be changed if the ITS is in an
>> active status, so it might not be safe to perform a soft reboot
>> with all the active ITSes un-disabled, etc. kexec.
>>
>> This patch will make sure all the active ITSes disabled before
>> enabling them again without resetting ITS hardware.
>
> And what happens if the kernel crashes or gets rebooted from a watchdog?
> Or if the bootloader messes things up? The ITS is in an unknown state
> when we start again.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to address this instead? Enforcing an safe initial
> state seems a better solution that relying on mechanisms that may not be
> relevant for all cases.
>
Sure, checking the ITS state before initializing it is really a better
solution, I will rewrite this patch and test again.
Thanks,
Abel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists