[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:09:12 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_request
the patch mosly looks good, except for one place:
On (02/02/15 13:28), Minchan Kim wrote:
> @@ -783,6 +812,8 @@ static ssize_t disksize_store(struct device *dev,
> goto out_destroy_comp;
> }
>
> + init_waitqueue_head(&zram->io_done);
> + zram_meta_get(zram);
it was
+ init_completion(&zram->io_done);
+ atomic_set(&zram->refcount, 1);
I think we need to replace zram_meta_get(zram) with atomic_set(&zram->refcount, 1).
->refcount is 0 by default and atomic_inc_not_zero(&zram->refcount) will not
increment it here, nor anywhere else.
> zram->meta = meta;
> zram->comp = comp;
> zram->disksize = disksize;
> @@ -838,8 +869,8 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
> /* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */
> fsync_bdev(bdev);
> bdput(bdev);
> -
[..]
> @@ -1041,6 +1075,7 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zram, int device_id)
> int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock);
> + atomic_set(&zram->refcount, 0);
sorry, I forgot that zram is kzalloc()-ated. so we can drop
atomic_set(&zram->refcount, 0)
> zram->queue = blk_alloc_queue(GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!zram->queue) {
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists