linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:55:48 +0000
From:	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
To:	"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"dovl@...eaurora.org" <dovl@...eaurora.org>,
	"ygardi@...eaurora.org" <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
	"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:26 +0100, hch@....de wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:30:27PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Cc added for linux-scsi, since this is the origin of the problem.  How
> > important is bisectability in this?  It won't affect any non-embedded
> > user, since most don't build with UFS, so I can go either way on folding
> > or just applying as an extra patch.
> 
> The CRYPTO_DEV_QCOM_ICE symbol was never defined in the scsi trees, and
> would have needed something else from linux-next to even compile.  So I
> don't think the revert is a problem at all, and I'll add it to the
> scsi-for-3.20 branch ASAP.

Actually, on the revert of 

scsi: ufs-qcom-ice: add Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) support for UFS

Which isn't what this problem is (the exports still need adding), since
it's only in the misc tree, let's just drop the patches rather than
doing an add and revert.

James