linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:22:15 -0400
From:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:33:09AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2015 at 00:29, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >

<big cut>

> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Thanks!

> 
> Now as these are all compilable as modules, should we look into the drivers as
> well to see what they are doing on module unload ?

hmm.. it seams to be the case, yes. From a quick look, there are unreleased resources
that needs to be freed. However, they are not really on module unload,
but on device removal. Which should be a reproducible but even today, in
case one manually unbinds the device.

Let me have a look here and will be sending something soon.


Thanks,

Eduardo Valentin


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)