[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:37:54 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>,
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [capabilities] Allow normal inheritance for a configurable set of capabilities
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com> wrote:
> Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@...aufler-ca.com):
>> I'm game to participate in such an effort. The POSIX scheme
>> is workable, but given that it's 20 years old and hasn't
>> developed real traction it's hard to call it successful.
>
> Over the years we've several times discussed possible reasons for this
> and how to help. I personally think it's two things: 1. lack of
> toolchain and fs support. The fact that we cannot to this day enable
> ping using capabilities by default because of cpio, tar and non-xattr
> filesystems is disheartening. 2. It's hard for users and applications
> to know what caps they need. yes the API is a bear to use, but we can
> hide that behind fancier libraries. But using capabilities requires too
> much in-depth knowledge of precisely what caps you might need for
> whatever operations library may now do when you asked for something.
None of this could address the problem here, though: if I hold a
capability and I want to pass that capability to an exec'd helper, I
shouldn't need the fs's help to do this.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists