[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:16:36 -0500
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] staging/lustre: fix comparison between signed and unsigned
On Feb 2, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:25:58PM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>>> What is this code supposed to be protecting from? And -1? That should
>>> never be a return value…
>>
>> Why is -1 a bad return value if all callsites check for that as an
>> indication of error?
>
> Because you should use "real" error values, don't make them up with
> random negative numbers that mean nothing.
>
>> (granted there's only one caller at this point in kernel space:
>> lustre/llite/dir.c::ll_dir_ioctl()
>> totalsize = hur_len(hur);
>> OBD_FREE_PTR(hur);
>> if (totalsize < 0)
>> return -E2BIG;
>> )
>
> Shouldn't you have returned the error that hur_len() passed you?
Ok, I guess that makes quite a bit of sense too.
I'll do an updated patch about that later on then.
Thanks!
Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists