linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: madvise: Ignore repeated MADV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150203094718.GO2395@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:47:18 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: madvise: Ignore repeated MADV_DONTNEED hints

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:22:36PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 08:55 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This patch identifies when a thread is frequently calling MADV_DONTNEED
> > on the same region of memory and starts ignoring the hint. On an 8-core
> > single-socket machine this was the impact on ebizzy using glibc 2.19.
> 
> The manpage, at least, claims that we zero-fill after MADV_DONTNEED is
> called:
> 

It also claims that the kernel is free to ignore the advice.

> >      MADV_DONTNEED
> >               Do  not  expect  access in the near future.  (For the time being, the application is finished with the given range, so the kernel can free resources
> >               associated with it.)  Subsequent accesses of pages in this range will succeed, but will result either in reloading of the memory contents  from  the
> >               underlying mapped file (see mmap(2)) or zero-fill-on-demand pages for mappings without an underlying file.
> 
> So if we have anything depending on the behavior that it's _always_
> zero-filled after an MADV_DONTNEED, this will break it.

True. I'd be surprised if any application depended on that but to be safe,
an ignored hint could clear the pages. It would still be cheaper than a
full teardown and refault.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/