[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D0A11A.4070906@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:21:14 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] ti-soc-thermal: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "cpufreq_cooling_unregister"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:15:14 +0100
The cpufreq_cooling_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
index 3fb054a..a38c175 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
- if (data && data->cool_dev)
+ if (data)
cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cool_dev);
return 0;
--
2.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists