[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150203015433.GA454@swordfish>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:54:33 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_request
On (02/02/15 16:06), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> So, guys, how about doing it differently, in less lines of code,
> hopefully. Don't move reset_store()'s work to zram_reset_device().
> Instead, move
>
> set_capacity(zram->disk, 0);
> revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
>
> out from zram_reset_device() to reset_store(). this two function are
> executed only when called from reset_store() anyway. this also will let
> us drop `bool reset capacity' param from zram_reset_device().
>
>
> so we will do in reset_store()
>
> mutex_lock(bdev->bd_mutex);
>
> fsync_bdev(bdev);
> zram_reset_device(zram);
> set_capacity(zram->disk, 0);
>
> mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
>
> revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
> bdput(bdev);
>
>
>
> and change zram_reset_device(zram, false) call to simply zram_reset_device(zram)
> in __exit zram_exit(void).
>
Hello,
Minchan, Ganesh, I sent a patch last night, with the above solution.
looks ok to you?
Minchan, I think I'll send my small struct zram clean-up patch after
your init_lock patch. what's your opinion?
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists