[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wrfjlhkft9jp.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 08:21:46 -0500
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Anjana Sasindran <anjanasasindran123@...il.com>,
Roberta Dobrescu <roberta.dobrescu@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723au: multiple condition with no effect - if identical to else
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org> writes:
> A number if/else if/else branches are identical - so the condition has no
> effect on the effective code and can be significantly simplified - this
> patch removes the condition and the duplicated code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> ---
>
> This looks like the output of some broken code-generator - unlikely someone
> wrote this by hand. In any case it needs a review by someone that knows the
> details of the driver.
>
> Anyway the number of useless code repetition is potentially record breaking !
>
> Patch was compile tested for x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_STAGING=y
> CONFIG_R8723AU=m, CONFIG_8723AU_BT_COEXIST=y
>
> Patch is against 3.0.19-rc7 (localversoin = -next-20150203)
>
> .../staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_bt-coexist.c | 60 +++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Why make it simple if you can make it complicated :)
I presume it's against 3.19-rc7 since a 3.0.19 would be rather obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists