[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D11872.2050701@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:50:26 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s() for secure deletion
of files
BTW.,
if someone still likes my trivial approach and thinks the patches might
be usable because they contain just a few silly changes which might be
easily rebased onto future kernel versions, I suggest to get rid of the
new syscall and just use something like
#define AT_WIPE 0x2000
in include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
for using the old unlinkat() with that new flag. That's much easier to
handle than a new syscall which likely never will end up in the kernel
and makes my silly patches even more simple.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists