[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL5CW+Aku_XBEzdkG8FKEVwrc=dWC+b1wjadnerjcrm-hfThVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:22:59 +0100
From: Robert Swiecki <swiecki@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples/seccomp: improve label helper
2015-02-03 19:56 GMT+01:00 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>:
> Fixes a potential corruption with uninitialized stack memory in the seccomp
> BPF sample program.
>
> Reported-by: Robert Swiecki <swiecki@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c | 4 +++-
> samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c b/samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c
> index 8eb483aaec46..e8b24f443709 100644
> --- a/samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c
> +++ b/samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,9 @@
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> - struct bpf_labels l;
> + struct bpf_labels l = {
> + .count = 0,
> + };
> static const char msg1[] = "Please type something: ";
> static const char msg2[] = "You typed: ";
> char buf[256];
> diff --git a/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c b/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c
> index 579cfe331886..f9fa14d81798 100644
> --- a/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c
> +++ b/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
> #include "bpf-helper.h"
> @@ -63,6 +64,10 @@ __u32 seccomp_bpf_label(struct bpf_labels *labels, const char *label)
> {
> struct __bpf_label *begin = labels->labels, *end;
> int id;
> + if (labels->count == BPF_LABELS_MAX) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Too many labels\n");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> if (labels->count == 0) {
> begin->label = label;
> begin->location = 0xffffffff;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS Security
Hi,
Thanks for the patch!
Not sure if we care, but with a more strict warning/error checking in
gcc I get now.
seccomp/bpf-helper.c:66:3: error: implicit declaration of function
‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
exit(1);
^
seccomp/bpf-helper.c:66:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of
built-in function ‘exit’ [-Werror]
--
Robert Święcki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists