linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Add missing static to file-scope declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <06c201d03f67$48da45b0$da8ed110$@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:10:02 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To:	'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Add missing static to file-scope
 declarations

Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> The 'pm_data', 'exynos_release_ret_regs' and
> 'exynos5420_release_ret_regs' are not exported nor used outside of
> suspend.c file. Make them static.
> 
> This fixes following sparse warnings:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c:83:23: warning: symbol 'pm_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c:106:14: warning: symbol 'exynos_release_ret_regs' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c:117:14: warning: symbol 'exynos5420_release_ret_regs' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> index 342797b9bf3b..fef091f8e59f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct exynos_pm_data {
>  	int (*cpu_suspend)(unsigned long);
>  };
> 
> -struct exynos_pm_data *pm_data;
> +static struct exynos_pm_data *pm_data;
> 
>  static int exynos5420_cpu_state;
>  static unsigned int exynos_pmu_spare3;
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static const struct exynos_wkup_irq exynos5250_wkup_irq[] = {
>  	{ /* sentinel */ },
>  };
> 
> -unsigned int exynos_release_ret_regs[] = {
> +static unsigned int exynos_release_ret_regs[] = {
>  	S5P_PAD_RET_MAUDIO_OPTION,
>  	S5P_PAD_RET_GPIO_OPTION,
>  	S5P_PAD_RET_UART_OPTION,
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ unsigned int exynos_release_ret_regs[] = {
>  	REG_TABLE_END,
>  };
> 
> -unsigned int exynos5420_release_ret_regs[] = {
> +static unsigned int exynos5420_release_ret_regs[] = {
>  	EXYNOS_PAD_RET_DRAM_OPTION,
>  	EXYNOS_PAD_RET_MAUDIO_OPTION,
>  	EXYNOS_PAD_RET_JTAG_OPTION,
> --

Looks ok to me, how about re-spin this patch including following?

...
+static unsigned int exynos3250_release_ret_regs[] = {
...

Thanks,
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/