[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D158C7.6020606@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:24:55 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] aio: fix sleeping while TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
On 02/03/2015 04:55 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> block/bsg.c- prepare_to_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>>> block/bsg.c- spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock);
>>> block/bsg.c: io_schedule();
>>> block/bsg.c- finish_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait);
>>>
>>> Which is double buggy because:
>>> 1) it doesn't loop
>>> 2) it sets TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE _after_ testing for the sleep event.
>>
>> OK, actually had a look at this one; it might be ok.
>>
>> The spinlock might fully serialize the state so no fails, and the entire
>> function is called in a loop. Still seriously obtuse code.
>
> Jens, would something like the below work for you?
Yes, from a cursory look, that seems fine to me. Though I will hold the
fact that you label my code as 'seriously obtuse' against you. Some day.
I can pull this in for testing for 3.20. Mind sending a properly
formatted patch (signed off, commit message, all that stuff)?
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists