linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 21/57] rbd: fix rbd_dev_parent_get() when parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150203231214.989717704@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  3 Feb 2015 15:14:12 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...hat.com>,
	Josh Durgin <jdurgin@...hat.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 21/57] rbd: fix rbd_dev_parent_get() when parent_overlap == 0

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...hat.com>

commit ae43e9d05eb4bd324155292f889fbd001c4faea8 upstream.

The comment for rbd_dev_parent_get() said

    * We must get the reference before checking for the overlap to
    * coordinate properly with zeroing the parent overlap in
    * rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() when an image gets flattened.  We
    * drop it again if there is no overlap.

but the "drop it again if there is no overlap" part was missing from
the implementation.  This lead to absurd parent_ref values for images
with parent_overlap == 0, as parent_ref was incremented for each
img_request and virtually never decremented.

Fix this by leveraging the fact that refresh path calls
rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() under header_rwsem and use it for read in
rbd_dev_parent_get(), instead of messing around with atomics.  Get rid
of barriers in rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() while at it - I don't see what
they'd pair with now and I suspect we are in a pretty miserable
situation as far as proper locking goes regardless.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/rbd.c |   20 ++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -2098,32 +2098,26 @@ static void rbd_dev_parent_put(struct rb
  * If an image has a non-zero parent overlap, get a reference to its
  * parent.
  *
- * We must get the reference before checking for the overlap to
- * coordinate properly with zeroing the parent overlap in
- * rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() when an image gets flattened.  We
- * drop it again if there is no overlap.
- *
  * Returns true if the rbd device has a parent with a non-zero
  * overlap and a reference for it was successfully taken, or
  * false otherwise.
  */
 static bool rbd_dev_parent_get(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 {
-	int counter;
+	int counter = 0;
 
 	if (!rbd_dev->parent_spec)
 		return false;
 
-	counter = atomic_inc_return_safe(&rbd_dev->parent_ref);
-	if (counter > 0 && rbd_dev->parent_overlap)
-		return true;
-
-	/* Image was flattened, but parent is not yet torn down */
+	down_read(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
+	if (rbd_dev->parent_overlap)
+		counter = atomic_inc_return_safe(&rbd_dev->parent_ref);
+	up_read(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
 
 	if (counter < 0)
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "parent reference overflow");
 
-	return false;
+	return counter > 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4236,7 +4230,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_parent_info(struct
 		 */
 		if (rbd_dev->parent_overlap) {
 			rbd_dev->parent_overlap = 0;
-			smp_mb();
 			rbd_dev_parent_put(rbd_dev);
 			pr_info("%s: clone image has been flattened\n",
 				rbd_dev->disk->disk_name);
@@ -4282,7 +4275,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_parent_info(struct
 	 * treat it specially.
 	 */
 	rbd_dev->parent_overlap = overlap;
-	smp_mb();
 	if (!overlap) {
 
 		/* A null parent_spec indicates it's the initial probe */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/