linux-kernel - Re: sequential I/O on SSD disk varies from 20 to 300 MBytes/s every week

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1502041138490.8618@q.xf.ee>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:50:58 +0200 (EET)
From:	Siim Vahtre <siim@...ee>
To:	Purush Gupta <purush.gupta@...anix.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sequential I/O on SSD disk varies from 20 to 300 MBytes/s every
 week

> Since you mentioned problem does not happen on Windows, what do you use 
> to emulate the workload (iometer ?)

CrystalDiskMark, HD Tune, ATTO Disk Benchmark

Tested for 2-3 hours, but got stable results. Directly afterwards booted 
Live CD with Linux and immediately got poor results.


> and did you see the same behaviour with other Kernel versions like 
> 2.6.32.

I did not test this, as this kernel version wouldn't work for me anyway. 
If you think it would be very important datapoint, I can try.


> You may want to check the per device queue configuration, lsscsi -L

"queue_depth=256", same for all disks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/