linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150204111349.GV21293@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:13:49 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
Cc:	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:45:29AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:

> Do you mean I send my RFC patch as the formal patch, and let other boards
> which use the wm8731 to add clk object, am I right?

No, we need to keep the boards working so we either need patches adding
the fixed clocks for existing boards or we need to have the handling of
missing clocks that Manuel suggested.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)