[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150204114213.GA5336@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:42:13 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abel Moyo <abelmoyo.ab@...il.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: core: switch with redundant cases
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:04:38AM -0500, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> A few redundant switch cases as well as a redundant if/else
> within one of the cases was consolidated to a single call.
> The cases are intentionally retained for documentation purposes.
This statement is not clear. It obviously causes a bug if you just
start deleting case statements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> ---
> case WIFI_REASSOCREQ,WIFI_PROBEREQ,WIFI_BEACON,WIFI_ACTION all
> have the same effect - notably the also for WIFI_PROBEREQ where
> the if/else is executing the same function.
>
> These redundant cases could all be dropped and consolidated into
> the default but probably it is better for documentation/readability
> to leave them in the switch/case explicitly.
Oh. This explains what you meant. Stop putting this information below
the cut off, it's annoying.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists