| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:22:10 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, wangyijing@...wei.com,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com, phoenix.liyi@...wei.com,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/21] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:48:32 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:04:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:29:36 PM Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 23:14 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday, February 02, 2015 08:45:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > > > From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > The acpi_os_ioremap() function may be used to map normal RAM or IO
> > > > > regions. The current implementation simply uses ioremap_cache(). This
> > > > > will work for some architectures, but arm64 ioremap_cache() cannot be
> > > > > used to map IO regions which don't support caching. So for arm64, use
> > > > > ioremap() for non-RAM regions.
> > > > >
> > > > > CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 6 ++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
> > > > > index 444671e..9d573db 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
> > > > > @@ -1,11 +1,17 @@
> > > > > #ifndef _ACPI_IO_H_
> > > > > #define _ACPI_IO_H_
> > > > >
> > > > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,
> > > > > acpi_size size)
> > > > > {
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> > > > > + if (!page_is_ram(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> > > > > + return ioremap(phys, size);
> > > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to see #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 in this file.
> > > >
> > >
> > > How about something like:
> > >
> > > From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:51:16 -0500
> > > Subject: [PATCH] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64
> > >
> > > The acpi_os_ioremap() function may be used to map normal RAM or IO
> > > regions. The current implementation simply uses ioremap_cache(). This
> > > will work for some architectures, but arm64 ioremap_cache() cannot be
> > > used to map IO regions which don't support caching. So for arm64, use
> > > ioremap() for non-RAM regions.
> > >
> > > CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 3 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> > > index ea4d2b3..db82bc3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-acpi.h>
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> > >
> > > /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
> > > @@ -100,4 +101,17 @@ static inline bool acpi_psci_use_hvc(void) { return false; }
> > > static inline void acpi_init_cpus(void) { }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * ACPI table mapping
> > > + */
> > > +static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,
> > > + acpi_size size)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!page_is_ram(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> > > + return ioremap(phys, size);
> > > +
> > > + return ioremap_cache(phys, size);
> > > +}
> > > +#define acpi_os_ioremap acpi_os_ioremap
> >
> > If you want to do it this way, use __weak. You won't need the #define then.
> > Otherwise, please use a proper CONFIG_ARCH_ symbol.
>
> How does __weak work with inline functions? I don't believe it does.
It doesn't work with inline funtions, but the function here doesn't have to be
inline.
> Moreover, __weak is positively harmful when you consider it adds bloat
> and dead code - the overriden __weak function is left behind in the
> resulting final image.
Fair enough.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists