[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D21EB8.6020208@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:29:28 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
CC: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
Am 04.02.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Alexander Holler:
>> I tell you that discussions of APIs should CC linux-api, which I am
>> now CCing into this thread, again, because, again, you're not
>> listening to feedback.
>
> Please don't confuse "not listening" with "unable to fulfill Linux
> kernel maintainer requests".
I really wonder what do you expect from people not getting paid to spend
time for fulfilling maintainer request?
I've written bugs and even offered some patches (regardless how usefull
there are in your eyes, it's more than most other people can do).
And all what it brought me is that I receive flames like your one.
Do you really think that's the right way to stimulate people in helping
to make Linux better?
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists