[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D225D6.6040603@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 05:59:50 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: watchdog: SOC_MT7621?
On 02/04/2015 04:22 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> John Crispin schreef op wo 04-02-2015 om 12:10 [+0100]:
>> i think wim should just drop it and we leave it in openwrt with the
>> other 1/2 million patches that we have. i prefer to upstream the stuff
>> without feeling pressured to hurry up, that kills the fun.
>
> Once code is mainlined you'll get fixes written for you, updates done
> for you, etc. But you'll also get pointed at defects that require you to
> fix them yourself, or see the code removed eventually.
>
>> @Wim, can you drop the patch please ?
>
> Why should Wim drop more than the
> || SOC_MT7621
>
> snippet?
>
Question is if the driver works with MT7620 as advertised. Either case
it would be odd if the driver advertises itself as MT7621 but only works
for MT7620, so I think it should be dropped entirely for now.
Wim, should I possibly ask Stephen to include my watchdog-next branch
in his -next builds ? This would help us catching such problems earlier.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists