lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-139b6fd26d85a65c4e0d2795b87b94f9505e5943@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:37:06 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Sharon Dvir <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/Documentation: Remove unneeded word

Commit-ID:  139b6fd26d85a65c4e0d2795b87b94f9505e5943
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/139b6fd26d85a65c4e0d2795b87b94f9505e5943
Author:     Sharon Dvir <sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il>
AuthorDate: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 23:47:32 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:52:33 +0100

sched/Documentation: Remove unneeded word

The second 'mutex' shouldn't be there, it can't be about the mutex,
as the mutex can't be freed, but unlocked, the memory where the
mutex resides however, can be freed.

Signed-off-by: Sharon Dvir <sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422827252-31363-1-git-send-email-sharon.dvir1@mail.huji.ac.il
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 4541951..5b49f65 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __visible void __sched __mutex_lock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count);
  * The mutex must later on be released by the same task that
  * acquired it. Recursive locking is not allowed. The task
  * may not exit without first unlocking the mutex. Also, kernel
- * memory where the mutex resides mutex must not be freed with
+ * memory where the mutex resides must not be freed with
  * the mutex still locked. The mutex must first be initialized
  * (or statically defined) before it can be locked. memset()-ing
  * the mutex to 0 is not allowed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ