[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D23A47.8040908@mm-sol.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:27:03 +0200
From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms
On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>> index bf1295e..115348c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI
>>>>
>>>> config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
>>>> tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
>>>> - depends on ARM
>>>> + depends on ARM || ARM64
>>>> depends on IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> default ARCH_QCOM
>>>
>>> But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended?
>>
>> No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also.
>
> But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it?
Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will
be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet.
--
regards,
Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists