[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1zj8tactc.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:58:23 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
>>>>> "Sedat" == Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> writes:
>>>>> I am seeing the following in my logs several times...
>>>>>
>>>>> Feb 4 02:53:13 fambox kernel: [15507.397482] blk_update_request:
>>>>> I/O error, dev loop0, sector 21261344 Feb 4 02:53:13 fambox
>>>>> kernel: [15507.397531] loop0: DISCARD failed. Manually zeroing.
Sedat> What's the plan... s/pr_warn/pr_debug ?
The rationale here is that we'd like to log (once) if discard or write
same fail on a given device.
In SCSI we disable these commands if they get failed by the storage. But
it looks like loop keeps advertising discard support after a failure.
Is your loop device encrypted? Do you know why the discard is failing?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists