| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:53:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
The complete() should not be used on offlined CPU. Rewrite the
wait-complete mechanism with wait_on_bit_timeout().
The CPU triggering hot unplug (e.g. CPU0) will loop until some bit is
cleared. In each iteration schedule_timeout() is used with initial sleep
time of 1 ms. Later it is increased to 10 ms.
The dying CPU will clear the bit which is safe in that context.
This fixes following RCU warning on ARMv8 (Exynos 4412, Trats2) during
suspend to RAM:
[ 31.113925] ===============================
[ 31.113928] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[ 31.113935] 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150203 #1914 Not tainted
[ 31.113938] -------------------------------
[ 31.113943] kernel/sched/fair.c:4740 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 31.113946]
[ 31.113946] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 31.113946]
[ 31.113952]
[ 31.113952] RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
[ 31.113952] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
[ 31.113957] 3 locks held by swapper/1/0:
[ 31.113988] #0: ((cpu_died).wait.lock){......}, at: [<c005a114>] complete+0x14/0x44
[ 31.114012] #1: (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c004a790>] try_to_wake_up+0x28/0x300
[ 31.114035] #2: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<c004f1b8>] select_task_rq_fair+0x5c/0xa04
[ 31.114038]
[ 31.114038] stack backtrace:
[ 31.114046] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150203 #1914
[ 31.114050] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 31.114076] [<c0014ce4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0011c30>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 31.114091] [<c0011c30>] (show_stack) from [<c04dc048>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc)
[ 31.114105] [<c04dc048>] (dump_stack) from [<c004f83c>] (select_task_rq_fair+0x6e0/0xa04)
[ 31.114118] [<c004f83c>] (select_task_rq_fair) from [<c004a83c>] (try_to_wake_up+0xd4/0x300)
[ 31.114129] [<c004a83c>] (try_to_wake_up) from [<c00598a0>] (__wake_up_common+0x4c/0x80)
[ 31.114140] [<c00598a0>] (__wake_up_common) from [<c00598e8>] (__wake_up_locked+0x14/0x1c)
[ 31.114150] [<c00598e8>] (__wake_up_locked) from [<c005a134>] (complete+0x34/0x44)
[ 31.114167] [<c005a134>] (complete) from [<c04d6ca4>] (cpu_die+0x24/0x84)
[ 31.114179] [<c04d6ca4>] (cpu_die) from [<c005a508>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x328/0x358)
[ 31.114189] [<c005a508>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<40008784>] (0x40008784)
[ 31.114226] CPU1: shutdown
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index 86ef244c5a24..bb8ff465975f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
@@ -76,6 +77,9 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_running);
+#define CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT 0
+static unsigned long wait_cpu_die;
+
static struct smp_operations smp_ops;
void __init smp_set_ops(struct smp_operations *ops)
@@ -133,6 +137,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret);
}
+ set_bit(CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, &wait_cpu_die);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
memset(&secondary_data, 0, sizeof(secondary_data));
return ret;
@@ -213,7 +219,40 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
return 0;
}
-static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
+/*
+ * Wait for 5000*1 ms for 'wait_cpu_die' bit to be cleared.
+ * Actually the real wait time will be longer because of schedule()
+ * called bit_wait_timeout.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if bit was cleared (CPU died) or non-zero
+ * otherwise (1 or negative ERRNO).
+ */
+static int wait_for_cpu_die(void)
+{
+ int retries = 5000, sleep_ms = 1, ret = 0;
+
+ might_sleep();
+
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
+ while (test_bit(CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, &wait_cpu_die)) {
+ ret = out_of_line_wait_on_bit_timeout(&wait_cpu_die,
+ CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, bit_wait_timeout,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sleep_ms));
+ if (!ret || (--retries <= 0))
+ break;
+
+ if (retries < 4000) {
+ /* After ~1000 ms increase sleeping time to 10 ms */
+ retries = 400;
+ sleep_ms = 10;
+ }
+
+ smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* For next test_bit() in loop */
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
/*
* called on the thread which is asking for a CPU to be shutdown -
@@ -221,7 +260,7 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
*/
void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
- if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_died, msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
+ if (wait_for_cpu_die()) {
pr_err("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n", cpu);
return;
}
@@ -236,6 +275,10 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
*/
if (!platform_cpu_kill(cpu))
pr_err("CPU%u: unable to kill\n", cpu);
+
+ /* Prepare the bit for some next CPU die */
+ set_bit(CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, &wait_cpu_die);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
}
/*
@@ -250,6 +293,8 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ WARN_ON(!test_bit(CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, &wait_cpu_die));
+
idle_task_exit();
local_irq_disable();
@@ -267,7 +312,8 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
* this returns, power and/or clocks can be removed at any point
* from this CPU and its cache by platform_cpu_kill().
*/
- complete(&cpu_died);
+ clear_bit(CPU_DIE_WAIT_BIT, &wait_cpu_die);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
/*
* Ensure that the cache lines associated with that completion are
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists