[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150204170951.GE26006@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:09:51 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Meet the bugs for linux-3.19-rc4 on aarch64 board
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:17:25PM +0000, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> bad mode in Synchronous Abort handler detected, code 0x86000005
> CPU: 1 PID: 381 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G O 3.19.0-rc4+ #6
> Hardware name: Hisilicon Board ESL (DT)
> Workqueue: events (null)
> task: ffffffc01cdb5800 ti: ffffffc01db28000 task.ti: ffffffc01db28000
> PC is at 0x0
> LR is at process_one_work+0x144/0x33c
This looks like process_one_work() tried to execute address 0, possibly
when it does:
worker->current_func(work);
> Internal error: Oops - bad mode: 0 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in: sre(O)
> CPU: 1 PID: 381 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G O 3.19.0-rc4+ #6
> Hardware name: Hisilicon Board ESL (DT)
> Workqueue: events (null)
So there is an "events" workqueue with a NULL function which
process_one_work() tries to call. You could add some more debugging in
this function or you could start bisecting (could check 3.18 first).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists