| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <8043345.BDfdhXvZOx@amdc1032>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:07:53 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:27:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Exynos cpuidle driver has coupled cpuidle built-in so it cannot be
> built without SMP:
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c: In function ‘exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr’:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:246:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_pre_enter_aftr':
> ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:300: undefined reference to `cpu_boot_reg_base'
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_cpu1_powerdown':
> ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:282: undefined reference to `exynos_cpu_power_down'
>
> Make the cpuidle driver depending on SMP because this will be the
> fastest way to fix build break without adding a bunch of ifdefs in few
> places.
There shouldn't be a lot of new ifdefs (please see below) and I would
very much prefer for cpuidle to stay supported also on UP kernels.
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 2 ++
> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index e6209dadc00d..17db00ff7f3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
> cpu_pm_exit();
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> static atomic_t cpu1_wakeup = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>
> static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void)
> @@ -302,3 +303,4 @@ struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data = {
> .pre_enter_aftr = exynos_pre_enter_aftr,
> .post_enter_aftr = exynos_post_enter_aftr,
> };
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE */
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> index 8e07c9419153..5eb86a4f74d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ config ARM_AT91_CPUIDLE
> config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> bool "Cpu Idle Driver for the Exynos processors"
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> - select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED if SMP
> + depends on SMP
> + select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED
> help
> Select this to enable cpuidle for Exynos processors
How's about the patch below instead? It builds fine for UP and SMP.
I will do more testing tomorrow (unfortunately it seems that something
else broke Origen4210 in -next).
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP
The Exynos cpuidle driver has coupled cpuidle built-in so it cannot be
built without SMP:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c: In function ‘exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr’:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:246:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_pre_enter_aftr':
../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:300: undefined reference to `cpu_boot_reg_base'
arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_cpu1_powerdown':
../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:282: undefined reference to `exynos_cpu_power_down'
Fix it by adding missing checks for SMP.
Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 2 ++
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:30:23.555819717 +0100
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:43:23.539807815 +0100
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_ini
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
exynos_sysram_init();
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE)
if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210"))
exynos_cpuidle.dev.platform_data = &cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data;
#endif
Index: b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c 2015-02-04 18:30:23.563819719 +0100
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c 2015-02-04 18:47:32.951804008 +0100
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
cpu_pm_exit();
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE)
static atomic_t cpu1_wakeup = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void)
@@ -302,3 +303,4 @@ struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupl
.pre_enter_aftr = exynos_pre_enter_aftr,
.post_enter_aftr = exynos_post_enter_aftr,
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE */
Index: b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:30:32.935819577 +0100
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:46:01.619805400 +0100
@@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct p
{
int ret;
- if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) &&
+ of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
exynos_cpuidle_pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
ret = cpuidle_register(&exynos_coupled_idle_driver,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists