lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed,  4 Feb 2015 18:30:37 +0000
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc:	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	yuyang.du@...el.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mturquette@...aro.org, nico@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	juri.lelli@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFCv3 PATCH 00/48] sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware scheduling

Several techniques for saving energy through various scheduler
modifications have been proposed in the past, however most of the
techniques have not been universally beneficial for all use-cases and
platforms. For example, consolidating tasks on fewer cpus is an
effective way to save energy on some platforms, while it might make
things worse on others.

This proposal, which is inspired by the Ksummit workshop discussions in
2013 [1], takes a different approach by using a (relatively) simple
platform energy cost model to guide scheduling decisions. By providing
the model with platform specific costing data the model can provide a
estimate of the energy implications of scheduling decisions. So instead
of blindly applying scheduling techniques that may or may not work for
the current use-case, the scheduler can make informed energy-aware
decisions. We believe this approach provides a methodology that can be
adapted to any platform, including heterogeneous systems such as ARM
big.LITTLE. The model considers cpus only, i.e. no peripherals, GPU or
memory. Model data includes power consumption at each P-state and
C-state.

This is an RFC and there are some loose ends that have not been
addressed here or in the code yet. The model and its infrastructure is
in place in the scheduler and it is being used for load-balancing
decisions. The energy model data is hardcoded, the load-balancing
heuristics are still under development, and there are some limitations
still to be addressed. However, the main idea is presented here, which
is the use of an energy model for scheduling decisions.

RFCv3 is a consolidation of the latest energy model related patches and
previously posted patch sets related to capacity and utilization
tracking [2][3] to show where we are heading. [2] and [3] have been
rebased onto v3.19-rc7 with a few minor modifications. Large parts of
the energy model code and use of the energy model in the scheduler has
been rewritten and simplified. The patch set consists of three main
parts (more details further down):

Patch 1-11:  sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage [2] (rebase)

Patch 12-19: sched: frequency and cpu invariant per-entity load-tracking
                    and other load-tracking bits [3] (rebase)

Patch 20-48: sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware scheduling (RFCv3)

Test results for ARM TC2 (2xA15+3xA7) with cpufreq enabled:

sysbench: Single task running for 3 seconds.
rt-app [4]: 5 medium (~50%) periodic tasks
rt-app [4]: 2 light (~10%) periodic tasks

Average numbers for 20 runs per test.

Energy		sysbench	rt-app medium	rt-app light
Mainline	100*		100		100
EA		279		88		63

* Sensitive to task placement on big.LITTLE. Mainline may put it on
  either cpu due to it's lack of compute capacity awareness, while EA
  consistently puts heavy tasks on big cpus. The EA energy increase came
  with a 2.65x _increase_ in performance (throughput).

[1] http://etherpad.osuosl.org/energy-aware-scheduling-ks-2013 (search
for 'cost')
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/15/136
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/328
[4] https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/Tools/WorkloadGen

Changes:

RFCv3:

'sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware scheduling' changes:
RFCv2->RFCv3:

(1) Remove frequency- and cpu-invariant load/utilization patches since
    this is now provided by [2] and [3].

(2) Remove system-wide sched_energy to make the code easier to
    understand, i.e. single socket systems are not supported (yet).

(3) Remove wake-up energy. Extra complexity that wasn't fully justified.
    Idle-state awareness introduced recently in mainline may be
    sufficient.

(4) Remove procfs interface for energy data to make the patch-set
    smaller.

(5) Rework energy-aware load balancing code.

    In RFCv2 we only attempted to pick the source cpu in an energy-aware
    fashion. In addition to support for finding the most energy
    inefficient source CPU during the load-balancing action, RFCv3 also
    introduces the energy-aware based moving of tasks between cpus as
    well as support for managing the 'tipping point' - the threshold
    where we switch away from energy model based load balancing to
    conventional load balancing.

'sched: frequency and cpu invariant per-entity load-tracking and other
load-tracking bits' [3]

(1) Remove blocked load from load tracking.

(2) Remove cpu-invariant load tracking.

    Both (1) and (2) require changes to the existing load-balance code
    which haven't been done yet. These are therefore left out until that
    has been addressed.

(3) One patch renamed.

'sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage' [2]

(1) Fixed conflict when rebasing to v3.19-rc7.

(2) One patch subject changed slightly.


RFC v2:
 - Extended documentation:
   - Cover the energy model in greater detail.
   - Recipe for deriving platform energy model.
 - Replaced Kconfig with sched feature (jump label).
 - Add unweighted load tracking.
 - Use unweighted load as task/cpu utilization.
 - Support for multiple idle states per sched_group. cpuidle integration
   still missing.
 - Changed energy aware functionality in select_idle_sibling().
 - Experimental energy aware load-balance support.


Dietmar Eggemann (17):
  sched: Make load tracking frequency scale-invariant
  sched: Make usage tracking cpu scale-invariant
  arm: vexpress: Add CPU clock-frequencies to TC2 device-tree
  arm: Cpu invariant scheduler load-tracking support
  sched: Get rid of scaling usage by cpu_capacity_orig
  sched: Introduce energy data structures
  sched: Allocate and initialize energy data structures
  arm: topology: Define TC2 energy and provide it to the scheduler
  sched: Infrastructure to query if load balancing is energy-aware
  sched: Introduce energy awareness into update_sg_lb_stats
  sched: Introduce energy awareness into update_sd_lb_stats
  sched: Introduce energy awareness into find_busiest_group
  sched: Introduce energy awareness into find_busiest_queue
  sched: Introduce energy awareness into detach_tasks
  sched: Tipping point from energy-aware to conventional load balancing
  sched: Skip cpu as lb src which has one task and capacity gte the dst
    cpu
  sched: Turn off fast idling of cpus on a partially loaded system

Morten Rasmussen (23):
  sched: Track group sched_entity usage contributions
  sched: Make sched entity usage tracking frequency-invariant
  cpufreq: Architecture specific callback for frequency changes
  arm: Frequency invariant scheduler load-tracking support
  sched: Track blocked utilization contributions
  sched: Include blocked utilization in usage tracking
  sched: Documentation for scheduler energy cost model
  sched: Make energy awareness a sched feature
  sched: Introduce SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES sched_domain flag
  sched: Compute cpu capacity available at current frequency
  sched: Relocated get_cpu_usage()
  sched: Use capacity_curr to cap utilization in get_cpu_usage()
  sched: Highest energy aware balancing sched_domain level pointer
  sched: Calculate energy consumption of sched_group
  sched: Extend sched_group_energy to test load-balancing decisions
  sched: Estimate energy impact of scheduling decisions
  sched: Energy-aware wake-up task placement
  sched: Bias new task wakeups towards higher capacity cpus
  sched, cpuidle: Track cpuidle state index in the scheduler
  sched: Count number of shallower idle-states in struct
    sched_group_energy
  sched: Determine the current sched_group idle-state
  sched: Enable active migration for cpus of lower capacity
  sched: Disable energy-unfriendly nohz kicks

Vincent Guittot (8):
  sched: add utilization_avg_contrib
  sched: remove frequency scaling from cpu_capacity
  sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
  sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig
  sched: get CPU's usage statistic
  sched: replace capacity_factor by usage
  sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level
  sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity

 Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.txt   | 359 +++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts |   5 +
 arch/arm/kernel/topology.c                 | 218 +++++--
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c                  |  10 +-
 include/linux/sched.h                      |  43 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c                        | 119 +++-
 kernel/sched/debug.c                       |  12 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c                        | 935 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched/features.h                    |   6 +
 kernel/sched/idle.c                        |   2 +
 kernel/sched/sched.h                       |  75 ++-
 11 files changed, 1559 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.txt

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ