linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] LLVMLinux: Correct size_index table before replacing the bootstrap kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54D27403.90000@iki.fi>
Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:33:23 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>
To:	Daniel Sanders <daniel.sanders@...tec.com>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] LLVMLinux: Correct size_index table before replacing
 the bootstrap kmem_cache_node.

On 2/3/15 3:37 PM, Daniel Sanders wrote:
> This patch moves the initialization of the size_index table slightly
> earlier so that the first few kmem_cache_node's can be safely allocated
> when KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE is large.

The patch looks OK to me but how is this related to LLVM?

- Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/