[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <27da5d1594c1b5b7db0e33d425edaa35d45535a8.1423086787.git.luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:53:26 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: [PATCH manpages] modify_ldt.2: Clarify the lm bit's behavior
The lm bit should never have existed in the first place. Sigh.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
---
man2/modify_ldt.2 | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/modify_ldt.2 b/man2/modify_ldt.2
index 1c2cf9cdef93..d6e0514973a6 100644
--- a/man2/modify_ldt.2
+++ b/man2/modify_ldt.2
@@ -187,12 +187,21 @@ The normal use for
.BR modify_ldt (2)
is to run legacy 16-bit or segmented 32-bit code.
Not all kernels allow 16-bit segments to be installed, however.
+.PP
+Even on 64-bit kernels,
+.BR modify_ldt (2)
+cannot be used to create a long mode (i.e. 64-bit) code segment. The
+undocumented field "lm" in
+.IR user_desc
+is not useful, and, despite its name, does not result in a long mode segment.
.SH BUGS
On 64-bit kernels before Linux 3.19,
.\" commit e30ab185c490e9a9381385529e0fd32f0a399495
-setting the "lm" padding bit in
+setting the "lm" bit in
.IR user_desc
-prevents the descriptor from being considered empty.
+prevents the descriptor from being considered empty. Keep in mind that the
+"lm" bit does not exist in the 32-bit headers, but these buggy kernels
+will still notice the bit even when set in a 32-bit process.
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR arch_prctl (2),
.BR set_thread_area (2),
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists