[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1423017992.7982.6.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:46:32 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
davej@...emonkey.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/exec: Check if the syscall exists and bail
if not
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:32 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 12:58 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >> On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a
> >> lot of output.
> >>
> >> Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if
> >> not just note one error and return.
> >>
> >> When we run on a system that doesn't implement the syscall we will get
> >> ENOSYS back from the kernel, so change the logic that handles
> >> __NR_execveat not being defined to also use ENOSYS rather than -ENOSYS.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> >
> > Acked-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks Michael, and David. I will queue this for 3.20
Thanks.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists