linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Remove ancient __FUNCTION_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150204150534.6969aa4b6108950ab2154906@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:05:34 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Remove ancient __FUNCTION__ hack

On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:49:17 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> trivia about macros vs c99 predefined identifiers below:
> 
> > diff -puN include/acpi/acoutput.h~kernelh-remove-ancient-__function__-hack-fix include/acpi/acoutput.h
> []
> > @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
> >  /*
> >   * If ACPI_GET_FUNCTION_NAME was not defined in the compiler-dependent header,
> >   * define it now. This is the case where there the compiler does not support
> > - * a __FUNCTION__ macro or equivalent.
> > + * a __func__ macro or equivalent.
> 
> Do these still make sense?  __func__ isn't a macro.

Yeah, but I was too lazy to think up more appropriate text.  Hey, it's
only ACPI :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/